MLK BLVD 3-1 over DOAN BROOK 3-1


+41.53333, -81.63000
41°31'60" N, 81°37'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:MLK BLVD 3-1 over DOAN BROOK 3-1
Structure number:1869507
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Total length:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:61.7 ft. [18.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year reconstructed:1986
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:22,000 [as of 1984]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Critical [2 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:61.3 tons [55.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.1 tons [43.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:28.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201528.0Structurally deficientFairFairCritical22000
December 201429.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryCritical22000
May 201329.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryCritical22000
April 201229.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryCritical22000
April 201166.4Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor22000
April 201082.4Not deficientGoodGoodFair22000
May 200782.4Not deficientGoodGoodFair22000
May 200693.9Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory22000
September 200593.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22000
December 200293.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood22000
October 200192.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood22000
September 200092.9Not deficientVery GoodExcellentVery Good22000
December 199992.9Not deficientVery GoodExcellentVery Good22000
September 199892.9Not deficientVery GoodExcellentVery Good22000
September 199792.9Not deficientVery GoodExcellentVery Good22000
October 199692.9Not deficientVery GoodExcellentVery Good22000
September 199592.7Not deficientVery GoodExcellentVery Good22000
March 199492.7Not deficientVery GoodExcellentVery Good22000
June 199395.7Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good22000
June 199195.7Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good22000