Share:

ALUM CREEK DRIVE over SR-104

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.91972, -82.93139
39°55'11" N, 82°55'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ALUM CREEK DRIVE over SR-104
Structure number:2508923
Location:0.69 MI W OF US 33
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:108.9 ft. [33.2 m]
Total length:240.2 ft. [73.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:77.1 ft. [23.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1986
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,900 [as of 1999]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:88.3

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201588.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16900
August 201488.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16900
June 201388.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16900
August 201288.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16900
August 201188.3Functionally obsolete-Very GoodVery Good16900
October 201088.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16900
September 200988.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good16900
April 200888.3Functionally obsoleteGoodExcellentVery Good16900
September 200788.3Functionally obsoleteGoodExcellentVery Good16900
July 200688.3Functionally obsoleteGoodExcellentVery Good16900
October 200588.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentVery Good16900
September 200488.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentVery Good16900
September 200388.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood16900
September 200289.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood7600
July 200089.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood7600
July 199889.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7600
August 199789.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7600
June 199693.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7600
September 199591.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7600
August 199491.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7600
June 199291.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7600
June 199191.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7600