Share:

CLIFTON AVE over ALUM CREEK (CLIFTON AVE)

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.97167, -82.94833
39°58'18" N, 82°56'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CLIFTON AVE over ALUM CREEK (CLIFTON AVE)
Structure number:2532557
Location:0.1 MI EAST OF NELSON RD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Total length:155.8 ft. [47.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:45.6 ft. [13.9 m]
Skew angle:27°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year reconstructed:2007
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,190 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:90.3

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201590.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood2190
December 201490.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood2190
January 201490.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood2190
December 201290.3Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood2190
January 201290.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood2190
December 201090.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood2190
January 201090.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood2190
December 200890.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood2190
January 200890.3Not deficientVery GoodExcellentGood2190
January 200730.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood6387
December 200530.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood6387
November 200449.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood6387
November 200369.1Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood6387
November 200280.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood6387
December 200180.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood6387
October 200080.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6387
October 199980.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood6387
December 199880.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood6387
November 199680.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood6387
August 199580.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood5509
December 199480.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood5509
October 199380.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood5509
November 199280.5Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood5509
December 199182.6Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood3980