Share:

GROVEPORT ROAD over (O) Railroad

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.89500, -82.96167
39°53'42" N, 82°57'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:GROVEPORT ROAD over (O) Railroad
Structure number:2560224
Location:.4 MI N/WILLIAMS ROAD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:82.0 ft. [25.0 m]
Total length:87.9 ft. [26.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Skew angle:43°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1910
Year reconstructed:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,840 [as of 1981]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:100.1 tons [91.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:79.5 tons [72.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$320,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201576.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7840
November 201476.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7840
July 201376.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7840
August 201276.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7840
August 201176.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7840
July 201076.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7840
October 200776.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
October 200676.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
July 200576.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
August 200476.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
October 200276.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
November 200176.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
November 200076.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
November 199876.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
October 199776.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
November 199676.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
August 199575.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
December 199475.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
December 199375.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7840
December 199263.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory7840
December 199163.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory7840