Share:

US50 over MUDDY CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.13194, -84.70806
39°07'55" N, 84°42'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:US50 over MUDDY CREEK
Structure number:3102734
Location:AT W CORP LINE CINCINNATI
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:87.9 ft. [26.8 m]
Total length:236.9 ft. [72.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:67.3 ft. [20.5 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Year reconstructed:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,240 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:87.4
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$750,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201587.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15240
September 201487.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15240
April 201387.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15240
September 201285.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood15240
July 201185.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15240
November 201085.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory14570
April 200985.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory14570
October 200885.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory14570
June 200785.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory14570
November 200685.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood14570
November 200586.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood13280
May 200486.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood13280
September 200389.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood9430
October 200289.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood9430
December 200189.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood9430
October 200091.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood9430
August 199991.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood9430
November 199891.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood9430
September 199791.8Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood9430
June 199691.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood9430
December 199493.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood8680
December 199374.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood8680
November 199138.4Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor8680
April 199138.4Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor8680