US50 over MUDDY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.13194, -84.7080639°07'55" N, 84°42'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | US50 over MUDDY CREEK |
| Structure number: | 3102734 |
| Location: | AT W CORP LINE CINCINNATI |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 87.9 ft. [26.8 m] |
| Total length: | 236.9 ft. [72.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 67.3 ft. [20.5 m] |
| Skew angle: | 20° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1955 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1993 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 14,570 [as of 2005] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 85.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $750,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 9,430 [as of 1994] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 91.8 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $750,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 8,680 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 59.4 tons [54.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 38.4 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $750,000 |