+39.10167, -84.54583
39°06'06" N, 84°32'45" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:3102807
Location:1.2 MI W OF I75
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:140.1 ft. [42.7 m]
Total length:1048.9 ft. [319.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:14
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:18,430 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201577.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood18430
November 201477.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood18430
February 201477.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory18430
September 201264.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory18430
November 201164.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory18430
April 201064.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory15805
December 200964.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory15805
June 200864.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory15805
July 200764.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory15805
April 200664.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood15805
September 200564.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood15635
June 200475.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood15635
October 200375.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16483
October 200275.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16483
August 200175.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16483
November 200077.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16483
August 199977.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16483
November 199877.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood16483
June 199677.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood16483
December 199477.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood10970
December 199261.0Structurally deficientPoorFairFair10970
November 199163.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair10970
April 199174.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood10970