+39.10167, -84.54583
39°06'06" N, 84°32'45" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:3102815
Location:1.2 MI W OF I75
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:143.1 ft. [43.6 m]
Total length:1047.0 ft. [319.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:59.1 ft. [18.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:14
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:18,430 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:75.2 tons [68.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:45.2 tons [41.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:95.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201595.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood18430
November 201495.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory18430
September 201317.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory18430
September 201261.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory18430
November 201161.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory18430
April 201061.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory15805
December 200961.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory15805
June 200863.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory15805
July 200763.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory15805
April 200664.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood15805
September 200564.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood15635
June 200475.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood15635
October 200375.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16483
October 200275.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16483
August 200175.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16483
November 200077.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16483
August 199977.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16483
November 199877.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16483
June 199677.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood16483
December 199477.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood10970
December 199263.0Structurally deficientPoorFairFair10970
November 199165.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair10970
April 199176.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10970