LYTLE PRK;FIFTH ST over I71

Map 

Facts 

Name:	LYTLE PRK;FIFTH ST over I71
Structure number:	3106578
Location:	.1 MI N OF US 50
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway
Route classification:	Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:	48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Total length:	132.9 ft. [40.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	48.6 ft. [14.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1971
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:	Frame [07]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	100 [as of 1970]
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	84.5

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	100 [as of 1970]
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	86.5

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	100 [as of 1970]
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	59.4 tons [54.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	84.5

Comments