Share:

WB I74 RMP-NB I75 over I75

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.15361, -84.54222
39°09'13" N, 84°32'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WB I74 RMP-NB I75 over I75
Structure number:3109798
Location:OVER IR 74 EB[RAMP P&X]
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:109.9 ft. [33.5 m]
Total length:838.0 ft. [255.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.2 ft. [9.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:12
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:84,860 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:106.9 tons [97.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:104.1 tons [94.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:51.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201551.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood84860
October 201451.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood84860
September 201351.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood84860
April 201251.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood84860
October 201151.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood84860
May 201051.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood84860
November 200935.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorGood84860
July 200835.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorGood84860
October 200751.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood84860
April 200662.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood84860
October 200562.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood84860
May 200462.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood84860
December 200362.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood84860
September 200262.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood84860
May 200181.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood88950
December 200082.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood88950
August 199982.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood88950
November 199882.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood88950
December 199782.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood88950
April 199682.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood88950
February 199582.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood88950
December 199382.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood88950
December 199182.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood88950
February 199182.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood88950