Share:

RAMP I71N-SR562 W over DUCK CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.16472, -84.42833
39°09'53" N, 84°25'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RAMP I71N-SR562 W over DUCK CREEK
Structure number:3115119
Location:.2 MI N OF SR 562
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Total length:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.5 ft. [9.3 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:22,580 [as of 1970]
Truck traffic:31% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.6 tons [26.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.8

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201574.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22580
August 201479.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood22580
October 201374.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood22580
December 201274.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood22580
September 201174.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood22580
October 201074.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood22580
October 200974.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood22580
December 200874.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood22580
November 200774.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood22580
October 200674.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory22580
October 200574.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22580
October 200474.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22580
October 200374.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22580
September 200274.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22580
September 200174.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22580
August 200076.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22580
November 199981.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22580
February 199881.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22580
May 199681.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22580
March 199583.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood22580
April 199483.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood22580
March 199383.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood22580
November 199183.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood22580
April 199183.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood22580