+39.15361, -84.54222
39°09'13" N, 84°32'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:US 27 EB over US27*S;MLCK;2RR;STS;RAMP
Structure number:3115739
Location:.5 MI W OF IR 75
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway, waterway, and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:173.9 ft. [53.0 m]
Total length:1117.5 ft. [340.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:75.1 ft. [22.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:77.4 ft. [23.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1973
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:10
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:48,443 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:106.9 tons [97.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:81.3 tons [73.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:81.8

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201581.8Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood48443
October 201481.8Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood48443
September 201381.8Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood48443
April 201281.8Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood48443
October 201181.8Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood48443
May 201080.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood56308
November 200980.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood56308
July 200880.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood56308
October 200792.7Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood56308
April 200692.7Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood56308
October 200591.6Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood56869
May 200493.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood41976
June 200393.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood41976
September 200293.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood41976
May 200194.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood41976
December 200094.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood41976
August 199994.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood41976
November 199894.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood41976
December 199794.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood41976
April 199694.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood41976
February 199595.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood37235
April 199491.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood35392
March 199391.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood35392
November 199191.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood35392
February 199191.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood35392