Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:3136337
Location:.4MI W OF I75&HOPPLE OPAS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway, waterway, and railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Total length:1925.9 ft. [587.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.2 ft. [15.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1916
Year reconstructed:1986
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:27
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:32,000 [as of 1990]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:38.5 tons [35.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.8 tons [20.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:55.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$13,700,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201555.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory32000
October 201470.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory32000
December 201355.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory32000
October 201255.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory32000
November 201155.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory32000
August 201062.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory32000
June 200962.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory32000
June 200862.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood32000
August 200762.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood32000
October 200662.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood32000
May 200562.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood32000
January 200362.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood32000
January 200262.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood32000
March 200062.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood32000
December 199862.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood32000
October 199562.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood32000
September 199362.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood32000
September 199262.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood32000
December 199162.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood32000
December 199049.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodFair32000