Share:

BEEKMAN AVENUE over WEST FORK CHANNEL (BEEKM

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BEEKMAN AVENUE over WEST FORK CHANNEL (BEEKM
Structure number:3136426
Location:0.1 MI S OF DREMAN BEEK I
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Total length:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.4 ft. [18.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1912
Year reconstructed:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,432 [as of 1990]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Inventory rating:106.9 tons [97.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:97.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$40,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201597.7Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood9432
April 201397.7Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood9432
May 201297.7Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood9432
June 201197.7Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood9432
May 201097.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9432
April 200997.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9432
April 200897.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9432
May 200797.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9432
April 200697.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9432
February 200597.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9432
October 200297.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9432
October 200197.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9432
October 199997.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodExcellent9432
November 199897.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodExcellent9432
October 199574.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent9432
October 199369.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9432
February 199369.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9432
November 199169.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9432
October 199069.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9432