Share:

EAST FORK AVENUE over LITTLE DUCK CREEK

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:EAST FORK AVENUE over LITTLE DUCK CREEK
Structure number:3136574
Location:100' E OF INT PLAINVIL&MA
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Total length:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1952
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 1991]
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:22.4 tons [20.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:13.5 tons [12.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:47.4

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201647.4Structurally deficientPoorFairFair100
February 201573.8Structurally deficientPoorFairFair100
March 201447.4Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory100
January 201347.4Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory100
March 201247.4Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory100
June 201031.7Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory100
March 200932.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory100
March 200832.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory100
May 200732.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory100
April 200632.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory100
February 200532.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory100
November 200245.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory100
November 200145.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory100
January 200043.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood100
December 199843.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood100
December 199544.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood100
October 199334.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood100
September 199284.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood100
November 199184.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood100
November 199084.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood100