Share:

PLAINVILLE ROAD over LITTLE DUCK CREEK (PLAIN

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:PLAINVILLE ROAD over LITTLE DUCK CREEK (PLAIN
Structure number:3136817
Location:800' S OF PLAINVIL&MADISN
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Total length:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1917
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11,200 [as of 1990]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:106.9 tons [97.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:106.9 tons [97.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:78.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201678.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood11200
March 201578.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood11200
February 201478.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory11200
February 201378.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory11200
May 201177.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory11200
June 201071.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
March 200971.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
March 200871.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
May 200771.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
April 200671.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
February 200571.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
November 200271.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
November 200171.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
January 200066.9Structurally deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
December 199866.9Structurally deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
December 199566.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory11200
October 199365.2Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
September 199265.2Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory11200
November 199065.2Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory11200