Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:3160610
Location:0.3 MI SW OF INT RAL&GERG
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:141.1 ft. [43.0 m]
Total length:311.0 ft. [94.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:70°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1953
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,150 [as of 1991]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Operating rating:38.5 tons [35.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.2 tons [21.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:62.4
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$75,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201562.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1150
July 201475.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1150
September 201363.1Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood1150
August 201263.1Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood1150
October 201163.4Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood1150
July 201062.4Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood1150
June 200971.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood1150
April 200871.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood1150
May 200771.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood1150
April 200671.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood1150
February 200571.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood1150
January 200371.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood1150
January 200271.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood1150
April 200067.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1150
October 199867.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1150
October 199567.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1150
October 199367.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1150
December 199267.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1150
January 199255.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairGood1150
March 199155.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairGood2000