Share:

ELM STREET over PETE ROSE WAY & PARKING

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.00000, -84.00000
39°00'00" N, 84°00'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ELM STREET over PETE ROSE WAY & PARKING
Structure number:3161978
Location:SOUTH OF 2ND & ELM INT.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Total length:527.9 ft. [160.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2000
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:18
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,874 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:79.5 tons [72.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.7 tons [43.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.6

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201576.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2874
September 201476.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good2874
September 201376.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good2874
August 201276.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good2874
July 201176.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2874
July 201076.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good2874
June 200976.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodExcellent2874
July 200876.6Not deficientGoodVery GoodExcellent2874
200076.6Not deficient---2874