SR 822(FT.STEUBEN) over OVER SR7NB,RR,OHIO R.
Map
Coordinates:
+40.37778, -80.6150040°22'40" N, 80°36'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SR 822(FT.STEUBEN) over OVER SR7NB,RR,OHIO R. |
| Structure number: | 4101987 |
| Location: | 1.47MI.N.OF MARKET ST BR |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 689.0 ft. [210.0 m] |
| Total length: | 1585.1 ft. [483.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 86.0 ft. [26.2 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1928 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1972 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Suspension [13] |
| Deck type: | Closed Grating [4] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,900 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 9.4 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $200,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5,910 [as of 1996] |
| Truck traffic: | 17% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 2.0 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,902,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 30.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,902,000 |