Share:

BROMFIELD RD over SWITZER CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.65000, -82.39333
40°38'60" N, 82°23'36" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BROMFIELD RD over SWITZER CREEK
Structure number:7035586
Location:0.3M S OF PLEASANT VALLEY
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Total length:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Corrugated Steel [6]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:478 [as of 1991]
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:17.9 tons [16.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:14.4 tons [13.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:31.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$214,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201531.8Structurally deficientExcellentFairPoor478
July 201456.8Structurally deficientExcellentFairPoor478
October 201331.5Structurally deficientExcellentFairPoor478
November 201243.3Structurally deficientExcellentFairPoor478
August 201142.3Structurally deficientFairFairPoor478
November 201042.3Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor478
September 200942.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor478
August 200842.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor478
September 200742.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor478
November 200642.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor478
August 200543.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor478
September 200443.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor478
October 200243.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor478
October 200143.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor478
November 200043.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor478
September 199956.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair478
August 199855.6Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair478
October 199756.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair478
September 199666.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory478
September 199565.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory478
September 199455.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair478
September 199342.4Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor478
September 199255.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair478
August 199065.6Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory478