Share:

OR 99W (HWY 001W) over ARTHUR STREET

Map 

Coordinates:
+45.50369, -122.67763
45°30'13" N, 122°40'39" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:OR 99W (HWY 001W) over ARTHUR STREET
Structure number:05194 01W 00141
Location:0.6 MI S OF BARBUR BLVD
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:71.5 ft. [21.8 m]
Total length:575.2 ft. [175.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:61.0 ft. [18.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1947
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:21,100 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:21.0 tons [19.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:13.0 tons [11.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:58.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$2,951,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201558.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory21100
May 201353.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory23900
May 201153.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory23900
February 201053.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15200
February 200855.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19055
May 200655.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory18500
February 200657.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory18500
February 200457.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory18300
February 200258.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood19300
February 200055.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood19300
February 199865.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood16600
February 199663.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16600
February 199472.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory13900
February 199270.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory13900