ARRAH WANNA BLVD over SALMON RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+45.33858, -121.9736745°20'19" N, 121°58'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | ARRAH WANNA BLVD over SALMON RIVER |
| Structure number: | 06572 003 00092 |
| Location: | 0.9 MI S OF HWY 26 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
| Total length: | 117.1 ft. [35.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1957 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 237 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 22.0 tons [20.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 13.0 tons [11.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 27.9 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $599,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 216 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; field review indicates that extensive scour has occurred at bridge foundations. [2] |
| Operating rating: | 21.8 tons [19.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 40.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $263,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 200 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 29.7 tons [27.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 18.6 tons [16.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 34.4 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $6,000 |