Share:

OR 213 (HWY 068) over HWY 2

Map 

Coordinates:
+45.53335, -122.57897
45°32'00" N, 122°34'44" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:OR 213 (HWY 068) over HWY 2
Structure number:07031A068 00225
Location:5.0 MI E PORTLAND CC
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:60.4 ft. [18.4 m]
Total length:153.9 ft. [46.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:104.7 ft. [31.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Skew angle:27°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1985
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:26,500 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.0 tons [23.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:81.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$2,684,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201581.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory26500
July 201381.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory23400
June 201180.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood23400
September 200980.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory23400
September 200783.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory27900
September 200583.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory27900
September 200383.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory26800
September 200193.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory28400
September 199990.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood27200
September 199790.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood27200
September 199591.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood18400
September 199391.6Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood18400
September 199190.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood17800