Share:

NE 12TH AVE over B-25 X BANFIELD AND UPRR

Map 

Coordinates:
+45.52869, -122.65361
45°31'43" N, 122°39'13" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:NE 12TH AVE over B-25 X BANFIELD AND UPRR
Structure number:07039 000 00437
Location:3 BLKS N OF GLISAN
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:128.0 ft. [39.0 m]
Total length:327.1 ft. [99.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:30.5 ft. [9.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1910
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,347 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:38.9 tons [35.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.0 tons [20.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:48.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$3,268,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201548.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory15347
September 201350.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory11036
September 201150.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory11036
November 200958.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory11036
March 200960.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory11036
November 200660.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10609
October 200460.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10609
September 200260.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10300
September 200060.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10000
June 199860.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10000
March 199862.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10000
April 199662.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10000
May 199462.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory14200
June 199276.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory14350
June 199074.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood14350