W BROADWAY over NECANICUM RV
Map
Coordinates:
+45.99321, -123.9243045°59'36" N, 123°55'27" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | W BROADWAY over NECANICUM RV |
| Structure number: | 07C11 000 00000 |
| Location: | 0.25 MI W. FAP 2 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
| Total length: | 151.9 ft. [46.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 53.5 ft. [16.3 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1924 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,622 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 55.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $857,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,600 [as of 1996] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 47.3 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,039,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,500 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 12.4 tons [11.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 67.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |