+45.46350, -122.69906
45°27'49" N, 122°41'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:SPRING GARDEN RD over I-5 (HWY 001)
Structure number:08202 001 29634
Location:1.3 MI N OF BARBUR BLVD
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:101.1 ft. [30.8 m]
Total length:188.7 ft. [57.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:51°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:23,680 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:35.0 tons [31.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:21.0 tons [19.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:35.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$1,311,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201635.4Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood23680
January 201435.4Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood23680
January 201235.4Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood23680
January 201035.4Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood23680
January 200835.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood23446
January 200636.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood22763
January 200437.4Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood22100
January 200271.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17000
January 200066.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17000
January 199868.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16200
January 199667.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16200
January 199467.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood16200
January 199272.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood16200