I-5 (HWY 001) over WILLAMETTE RIVER MARQUAM
Map
Coordinates:
+45.50676, -122.6709545°30'24" N, 122°40'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | I-5 (HWY 001) over WILLAMETTE RIVER MARQUAM |
| Structure number: | 08328 001 30038 |
| Location: | 1.1 MI S OF BURNSIDE BR |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
| Length of largest span: | 440.0 ft. [134.1 m] |
| Total length: | 1044.0 ft. [318.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 113.9 ft. [34.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 168.0 ft. [51.2 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 71.9 ft. [21.9 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1966 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Truss - Deck [09] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 135,900 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 54.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $5,883,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 131,800 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 17% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 57.4 tons [52.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 81.0 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 101,900 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 17% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 57.4 tons [52.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 63.0 |