Share:

TERWILLIGER BLVD. over I 5 (HWY 1)

Map 

Coordinates:
+45.46989, -122.68612
45°28'12" N, 122°41'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:TERWILLIGER BLVD. over I 5 (HWY 1)
Structure number:08392C001C29717
Location:1.7 M S OF ROSS ISL. BR.
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:205.1 ft. [62.5 m]
Total length:687.0 ft. [209.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:61.7 ft. [18.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:21.3 ft. [6.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,400 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:75.8 tons [68.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:91.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$7,068,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201691.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory8400
January 201492.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory7300
January 201292.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory7300
January 201092.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7000
January 200889.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17929
January 200691.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17407
January 200491.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16900
January 200292.8Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good13000
January 200092.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good13000
January 199893.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good11730
January 199693.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good11730
January 199493.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good11730