COLUMBIA BLVD over OR 213 (HWY 068)


+45.56463, -122.57766
45°33'53" N, 122°34'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:COLUMBIA BLVD over OR 213 (HWY 068)
Structure number:08401B068C00037
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Total length:184.1 ft. [56.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:66.6 ft. [20.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:14°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:25,900 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:54.9 tons [49.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.9 tons [29.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:79.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$2,040,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201579.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory25900
June 201390.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19600
June 201190.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood19600
February 201089.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood19600
September 200790.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8838
September 200590.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8838
September 200390.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8581
September 200190.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6601
September 199990.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6601
September 199794.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood6600
September 199591.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6600
September 199391.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6600
September 199190.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6400