Share:

US 26 (HWY 026) EB over HWY 61 I-405

Map 

Coordinates:
+45.50053, -122.67349
45°30'02" N, 122°40'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:US 26 (HWY 026) EB over HWY 61 I-405
Structure number:09153R026 00002
Location:1.0 MI S PORTLAND CC
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:97.1 ft. [29.6 m]
Total length:195.9 ft. [59.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,200 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:51.9 tons [47.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:30.9 tons [28.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:70.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$1,144,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201570.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6200
July 201368.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9322
July 201171.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory9322
May 201071.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood9322
September 200974.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood9322
October 200776.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8961
October 200579.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8961
October 200379.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8961
October 200179.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood8700
October 199976.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8700
October 199776.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8700
October 199577.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8700
September 199396.3Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood8700
October 199194.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood8600