Share:

SW PARK over HWY 61

Map 

Coordinates:
+45.50930, -122.68649
45°30'33" N, 122°41'11" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SW PARK over HWY 61
Structure number:09161 061 00118
Location:0.2 MI S OF SW 12TH AVE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Total length:186.0 ft. [56.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:104.0 ft. [31.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.7 ft. [5.4 m]
Skew angle:24°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

2010 Inspection 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:115,600 [as of 2008]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:62.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$3,218,000

2000 Inspection 

Average daily traffic:79,000 [as of 2000]
Evaluation:Not applicable [N]

1992 Inspection 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,200 [as of 1988]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:60.4 tons [54.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:78.3