HWY 160 (OR 213) over UPRR


+45.35960, -122.60383
45°21'35" N, 122°36'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:HWY 160 (OR 213) over UPRR
Structure number:09727 064C01036
Location:1.0 MI N OREGON CITY CC
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Total length:208.0 ft. [63.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:92.5 ft. [28.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Skew angle:26°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:64,700 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:51.4 tons [46.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:68.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$1,066,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201568.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory64700
June 201379.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory65000
March 201178.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory65000
March 200983.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood67559
March 200785.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood64942
March 200586.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood63050
March 200386.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood63050
March 200188.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood48500
March 199988.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood48000
March 199789.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood46500
March 199588.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood46500
March 199388.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood46500
March 199191.8Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood41500