GILKEY ROAD over THOMAS CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+44.68785, -122.9034744°41'16" N, 122°54'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | GILKEY ROAD over THOMAS CREEK |
| Structure number: | 12943 062900107 |
| Location: | 003 MI N CR 628 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 120.1 ft. [36.6 m] |
| Total length: | 201.1 ft. [61.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 17.4 ft. [5.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 11.8 ft. [3.6 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1939 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Wood or timber [7] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 250 [as of 2005] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 38.0 tons [34.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.0 tons [20.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 46.6 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,133,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 225 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 16.8 tons [15.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 8.9 tons [8.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 35.7 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $469,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 225 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 11.9 tons [10.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 11.9 tons [10.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 36.0 |