102ND AVE over HY2 CON 2&3/HY64 CON 1&2


+45.54702, -122.55777
45°32'49" N, 122°33'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:102ND AVE over HY2 CON 2&3/HY64 CON 1&2
Structure number:13514E002C00676
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:125.0 ft. [38.1 m]
Total length:461.3 ft. [140.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:66.6 ft. [20.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1977
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,300 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:91.9 tons [83.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:54.9 tons [49.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:88.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$5,096,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201588.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory15300
April 201388.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood15300
April 201188.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood15300
April 200987.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood18165
April 200787.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory17461
April 200590.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory17461
April 200390.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood16952
May 200290.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood16952
May 200089.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood13040
20000.0Not applicable---9500
May 199890.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood10500
May 199690.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood10500
May 199490.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood10500
May 199290.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood10500
May 199089.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood10200