+45.49167, -122.40833
45°29'30" N, 122°24'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:25T08 000 00094
Location:010 MI E CLACKAMAS CO L
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.3 ft. [6.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:21.7 ft. [6.6 m]
Skew angle:36°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,134 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:56.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$169,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201456.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair2134
July 201257.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2134
August 201057.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2134
December 200957.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2134
October 200815.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryCritical2134
June 200668.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2051
September 200468.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood2051
July 200268.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2051
April 200068.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1990
July 199868.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1990
May 199668.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1990
June 199470.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1990
May 199271.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory1800
May 199071.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory1800