I-84 (HWY 002) CON over LRT TRACKS


+45.53397, -122.62581
45°32'02" N, 122°37'33" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:I-84 (HWY 002) CON over LRT TRACKS
Structure number:R7026A059 00182
Location:3.0 MI E OF PORTLAND CC
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Total length:930.5 ft. [283.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.5 ft. [9.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:43.6 ft. [13.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1984
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:17
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:29,810 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:15% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:76.9 tons [69.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:83.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$4,766,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201583.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory29810
April 201383.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory29810
August 201183.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory29810
November 200996.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory29810
November 200796.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory29515
November 200596.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory28655
November 200396.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory27820
November 200196.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood21400
November 199996.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood21400
November 199796.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood18100
November 199596.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood18100
November 199396.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood18100
November 199196.0Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good18100