I-5 (HWY 001) SB over UPRR
Map
Coordinates:
+45.50424, -122.6737845°30'15" N, 122°40'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | I-5 (HWY 001) SB over UPRR |
| Structure number: | S8588E001 30170 |
| Location: | 0.2 MI N OF BURNSIDE BR |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
| Length of largest span: | 214.9 ft. [65.5 m] |
| Total length: | 2249.1 ft. [685.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 44.6 ft. [13.6 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1963 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 22 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 46,208 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 87.3 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 64,600 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 49.5 tons [45.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 85.6 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $12,002,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 29,100 [as of 1989] |
| Truck traffic: | 17% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 49.5 tons [45.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 87.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $27,000 |