PARKWAY WEST over SAW MILL RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+40.41433, -80.0099740°24'52" N, 80°00'36" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | PARKWAY WEST over SAW MILL RUN |
| Structure number: | 020279005005800 |
| Location: | 750' SW / FT PITT TUNNELS |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
| Length of largest span: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
| Total length: | 46.9 ft. [14.3 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1952 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 61,006 [as of 2010] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Operating rating: | 84.8 tons [77.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 50.9 tons [46.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 57.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 106,981 [as of 2000] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 57.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |