I 279 RAMP F over I-279 NB RAMP D ALLGY RI
Map
Coordinates:
+40.45000, -80.0166740°27'00" N, 80°01'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | I 279 RAMP F over I-279 NB RAMP D ALLGY RI |
| Structure number: | 020279006500000 |
| Location: | LR1039 LOWER APPR FT DUQ |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
| Length of largest span: | 122.1 ft. [37.2 m] |
| Total length: | 351.1 ft. [107.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.6 ft. [8.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 99° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1968 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1985 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 40,321 [as of 2010] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 95.8 tons [87.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 56.9 tons [51.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 65.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50,565 [as of 2000] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 81.2 tons [73.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 67.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $421,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 26,499 [as of 1992] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Inventory rating: | 60.4 tons [54.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 71.6 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $265,000 |