Share:

RAMP S, ALLIES BL over RAMP R,02266 RPS.,FORBES

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.43625, -79.96983
40°26'10" N, 79°58'11" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RAMP S, ALLIES BL over RAMP R,02266 RPS.,FORBES
Structure number:000000000001321
Old structure number:020885033113020 (from 1992 edition)
Location:@ N.END OF BIRMINGHAM BR.
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:99.1 ft. [30.2 m]
Total length:1573.2 ft. [479.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1952
Year reconstructed:1984
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:20
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,819 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:66.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201566.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair10819
August 201364.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair10938
August 201164.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair10232
August 200964.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair10343
August 200764.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory10884
August 200566.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory10711
August 200365.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory12427
August 200164.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory22210
October 199976.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22210
20000.0Not applicable---20569
September 199774.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory21011
September 199575.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory27425
September 199375.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory14884