SALEM HOLLOW RD over BR. NORTH FORK PINE CRK.
Map
Coordinates:
+40.62713, -80.0289340°37'38" N, 80°01'44" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SALEM HOLLOW RD over BR. NORTH FORK PINE CRK. |
| Structure number: | 020910008028170 |
| Location: | 0.3 MI.W.OF INTER.W.02141 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.6 ft. [8.4 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1940 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 7,334 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 60.8 tons [55.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 44.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 9,912 [as of 2000] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 57.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $150,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,282 [as of 1992] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 49.5 tons [45.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 30.7 tons [27.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 63.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $218,000 |