TRIPHAMMER RD over PINEY FORK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.39378, -80.0873340°23'38" N, 80°05'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | TRIPHAMMER RD over PINEY FORK CREEK |
| Structure number: | 027219031525710 |
| Location: | PF01 PINEY FORK CRK # 1 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Total length: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1902 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Main span material: | Masonry [8] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 803 [as of 2005] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 24.0 tons [21.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 55.2 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 803 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 66.5 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $52,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 803 [as of 1991] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 77.6 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $71,000 |