OAKWOOD RD over PENSDALE ST,OAKWOOD RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+40.42982, -80.0661640°25'47" N, 80°03'58" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | OAKWOOD RD over PENSDALE ST,OAKWOOD RUN |
| Structure number: | 027301000024980 |
| Location: | OK03 OAKWOOD RUN NO. 3 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 138.1 ft. [42.1 m] |
| Total length: | 354.0 ft. [107.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1984 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,700 [as of 2006] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 73.8 tons [67.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 43.9 tons [39.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 76.3 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,700 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 89.1 tons [81.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 76.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $267,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,700 [as of 1990] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 68.3 tons [62.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 38.6 tons [35.1 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 76.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $186,000 |