+40.38665, -79.93234
40°23'12" N, 79°55'56" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:000000000002391
Old structure number:027301000028620 (from 1992 edition)
Location:SZ02 STREETS RUN #2
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Total length:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.7 ft. [11.2 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1981
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,253 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:70.8 tons [64.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:66.1

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201466.1Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair4253
August 201266.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair4389
August 201077.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory4436
September 200879.1Not deficientFairGoodGood4814
September 200679.2Not deficientFairGoodGood4738
September 200475.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood16252
September 200275.1Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood15838
October 200075.1Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood15557
October 199875.2Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood15282
October 199677.3Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodSatisfactory14717
November 199475.3Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood13882
September 199268.0Not deficientFairVery GoodFair4500
October 199098.4Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodGood4057