ALEXANDER ST over SAW MILL RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+40.44007, -80.0333540°26'24" N, 80°02'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | ALEXANDER ST over SAW MILL RUN |
| Structure number: | 027301000030010 |
| Location: | 301001 NEAR NEPTUNE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Total length: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 11.8 ft. [3.6 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1924 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Girder and floorbeam system [03] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 2006] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 22.0 tons [20.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 20.1 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 20% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 17.8 tons [16.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 16.2 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $62,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 1990] |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 7.9 tons [7.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 13.8 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $62,000 |