Share:

BLOOMFIELD BR over N-S RR,CSX RR,E BSWY,PL

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.46035, -79.95575
40°27'37" N, 79°57'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BLOOMFIELD BR over N-S RR,CSX RR,E BSWY,PL
Structure number:000000000002398
Old structure number:027301000030100 (from 1992 edition)
Location:301010 BLOOMFIELD BRIDGE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:299.9 ft. [91.4 m]
Total length:1541.1 ft. [469.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:58.1 ft. [17.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:67.6 ft. [20.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.5 ft. [3.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1986
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:30,000 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.0 tons [20.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:67.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201567.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair30000
April 201367.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair30000
April 201167.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair30000
April 200967.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair30000
April 200778.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory30000
April 200580.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory30000
April 200380.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory30000
April 200180.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory30000
May 199980.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory30000
April 199780.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood30000
April 199596.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood30000
April 199496.7Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good30000
April 199396.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood30000
April 199196.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good30000