Share:

RAMP-C RD over CHATEAU ST.,R/RX,BUSLINE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.46167, -80.03167
40°27'42" N, 80°01'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RAMP-C RD over CHATEAU ST.,R/RX,BUSLINE
Structure number:000000000002835
Old structure number:028043075000000 (from 1992 edition)
Location:RT.65 RP.C SB/BEAVER AVE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:237.9 ft. [72.5 m]
Total length:1268.1 ft. [386.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.3 ft. [6.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.6 ft. [7.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:11.2 ft. [3.4 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Year reconstructed:2014
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:602 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:60.8 tons [55.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.9
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$3,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201494.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good602
March 201259.6Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor5774
March 201061.0Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor218
March 200860.0Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor218
March 200689.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory215
March 200474.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory210
March 200278.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory204
April 200070.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory200
April 199877.5Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory106
May 199685.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory100
April 199493.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory-
May 199291.9Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactorySatisfactory-