Share:

8065 RAMP-F RD over I-376,RAMP V, & 2ND AVE.

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.43585, -79.96910
40°26'09" N, 79°58'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:8065 RAMP-F RD over I-376,RAMP V, & 2ND AVE.
Structure number:000000000002877
Old structure number:028065001000000 (from 1992 edition)
Location:BIRMINGHAM BRG OFF RAMP
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:157.2 ft. [47.9 m]
Total length:892.1 ft. [271.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.5 ft. [9.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1976
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:8
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,201 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:71.8 tons [65.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:62.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201462.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory3201
July 201248.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory5070
July 201048.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory4399
May 200951.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory4399
July 200851.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory4399
April 200820.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairImminent Failure4399
April 200668.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory4329
April 200468.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory4286
April 200283.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory121
May 200091.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory119
20000.0Not applicable---123193
May 199894.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood115
June 199696.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood111
June 199488.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory106
June 199289.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory-