Share:

RAMP F RD over LR 228 RAMP D

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.43833, -79.99500
40°26'18" N, 79°59'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RAMP F RD over LR 228 RAMP D
Structure number:000000000002890
Old structure number:028078003003700 (from 1992 edition)
Location:RP.F O/RP.D TO 7TH AVE.
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Total length:107.9 ft. [32.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.6 ft. [6.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1962
Year reconstructed:1988
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,327 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:75.8 tons [68.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:94.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201494.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory2327
January 201294.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory18625
January 201094.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory128
January 200883.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair128
January 200683.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair125
January 200483.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair123
January 200296.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory119
January 200096.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory117
January 199896.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory113
January 199694.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory108
January 199494.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory104
January 199296.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryGood-