Share:

RAMP W RD over 1021 RP.B & SCOTLAND AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.45000, -80.00833
40°27'00" N, 80°00'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RAMP W RD over 1021 RP.B & SCOTLAND AVE
Structure number:000000000002924
Old structure number:028107001001580 (from 1992 edition)
Location:NEAR HEINZ FIELD
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:109.9 ft. [33.5 m]
Total length:1168.0 ft. [356.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1986
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11,756 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:92.7 tons [84.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:91.5

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201491.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory11756
June 201291.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory8876
June 201092.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory153
June 200892.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory153
June 200692.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory150
June 200479.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair147
June 200280.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair143
June 200091.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory140
20000.0Not applicable---138
May 199891.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory135
June 199696.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory133