Share:

CARVER-WISMER ROAD over CABIN RUN (COVERED BRDG)

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.42294, -75.12777
40°25'23" N, 75°07'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CARVER-WISMER ROAD over CABIN RUN (COVERED BRDG)
Structure number:000000000007108
Old structure number:091003023000000 (from 1992 edition)
Location:PIPERSVILLE 17B04
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:70.9 ft. [21.6 m]
Total length:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:19.4 ft. [5.9 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:9.5 ft. [2.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1874
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:358 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Operating rating:33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:19.9 tons [18.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:48.1
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201448.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory358
February 201214.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory403
February 201048.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory400
February 200848.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory400
February 200647.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory395
November 200447.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory388
October 200348.0Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory373
November 200248.0Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory329
November 200155.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood325
August 200055.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood325
September 199953.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood244
August 199855.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory240
July 199755.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory269
July 199655.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory263
August 199548.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair263